Cross-Chain Communication
0.67%
−0.00%24h Change
7d Change
| 7d Chart | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 LINK 14Chainlink | $11.99 | 0.09% | −10.00% | −3.41% | $8.97 B | $11.97 B | $136.10 M | |||
18 NEAR 18NEAR Protocol | $4.94 | 1.31% | −14.17% | 27.95% | $6.48 B | $6.47 B | $445.93 M | |||
66 JUP 66Jupiter | $0.2887 | −1.29% | −21.31% | 7.80% | $958.30 M | $1.97 B | $47.97 M | |||
75 ZRO 75LayerZero | $1.84 | −1.47% | −11.80% | 62.38% | $739.19 M | $1.84 B | $36.01 M | |||
86 PYTH 86Pyth Network | $0.07395 | −7.20% | −6.13% | 21.86% | $582.35 M | $736.70 M | $28.52 M | |||
165 ZAMA 165Zama | $0.06965 | −3.43% | −10.38% | 16.81% | $177.37 M | $765.27 M | $4.02 M | |||
179 SOON 179SOON | $0.3032 | −2.12% | −1.24% | 57.57% | $151.62 M | $302.50 M | $6.14 M | |||
249 W 249Wormhole | $0.01292 | −6.01% | −41.36% | 17.85% | $86.02 M | $128.90 M | $13.82 M | |||
288 AXL 288Axelar | $0.057 | −1.19% | −1.72% | 22.82% | $71.23 M | $71.67 M | $15.90 M | |||
299 ZETA 299ZetaChain | $0.04119 | −3.03% | −13.38% | 8.52% | $68.20 M | $86.12 M | $3.99 M | |||
312 BABYDOGE 312Baby Doge Coin | $0.0₈3537 | −1.42% | −9.42% | −10.38% | $63.38 M | $71.32 M | $2.34 M | |||
350 ELF 350aelf | $0.0789 | −1.23% | −14.06% | −12.65% | $65.40 M | $62.42 M | $1.69 M | |||
451 RIVER 451River | $1.01 | −4.27% | −11.81% | −20.72% | $37.58 M | $100.50 M | $841,540.82 | |||
493 DBR 493deBridge | $0.01883 | −1.36% | −3.17% | 17.38% | $33.89 M | $188.10 M | $1.24 M | |||
559 ACX 559Across Protocol | $0.04339 | 0.07% | 0.55% | −1.07% | $31.42 M | $42.77 M | $76,661.00 | |||
571 FLUX 571Flux | $0.0709 | −5.94% | −19.25% | 24.71% | $29.92 M | $29.86 M | $4.57 M | |||
621 FLIP 621Chainflip | $0.3015 | 1.98% | 0.29% | −14.36% | $26.50 M | $26.50 M | $30,548.28 | |||
748 CELR 748Celer Network | $0.002516 | −4.17% | −19.05% | 9.16% | $19.67 M | $25.08 M | $3.15 M | |||
805 LUMIA 805Lumia | $0.0936 | −1.03% | −24.96% | 20.13% | $17.19 M | $22.38 M | $1.50 M | |||
870 STG 870Stargate Finance | $0.159 | −2.85% | −12.63% | 12.38% | $15.03 M | $159.00 M | $24,748.50 | |||
968 PORTAL 968Portal | $0.01436 | −3.15% | −13.43% | −20.39% | $12.55 M | $14.31 M | $1.87 M | |||
1028 WAN 1028Wanchain | $0.05708 | 1.57% | 0.29% | −3.10% | $11.38 M | $11.38 M | $186,246.69 | |||
1067 HYPER 1067Hyperlane | $0.0595 | −4.79% | −19.72% | −18.11% | $10.42 M | $59.39 M | $1.73 M | |||
1151 THOR 1151THORSwap | $0.03525 | 8.22% | −5.84% | −5.51% | $8.93 M | $9.91 M | $7,641.64 | |||
1210 ZEUS 1210Zeus Network | $0.008765 | −7.40% | −10.25% | 260.57% | $8.16 M | $8.80 M | $2.83 M | |||
1366 ANY 1366Anyspend | $0.02788 | −1.51% | −8.98% | 9.42% | $6.13 M | $27.88 M | $1.56 | |||
1371 SUPRA 1371Supra | $0.000132 | −5.60% | −9.47% | −21.88% | $6.02 M | $11.00 M | $175,049.44 | |||
1402 PTB 1402Portal to Bitcoin | $0.0006935 | −2.62% | −20.68% | 0.38% | $5.66 M | $5.78 M | $251,184.03 | |||
1443 HFT 1443Hashflow | $0.005554 | −7.63% | −17.57% | −5.21% | $5.22 M | $5.54 M | $1.27 M | |||
1502 HDN 1502Hydranet | $0.02535 | −0.84% | −15.56% | −28.65% | $4.77 M | $7.61 M | $39,460.00 | |||
1576 VULT 1576Vultisig | $0.06552 | −0.40% | 1.88% | 3.38% | $4.26 M | $6.55 M | $5.63 | |||
1579 PNT 1579Pheasant Network | $0.03363 | −4.86% | −13.86% | −48.71% | $4.24 M | $33.64 M | $3.63 M | |||
1635 FOX 1635ShapeShift FOX | $0.005016 | −2.02% | −8.91% | −1.36% | $3.87 M | $5.01 M | $30,645.92 | |||
1646 ICX 1646ICON | $0.003454 | −59.64% | −75.27% | −63.53% | $3.79 M | $3.83 M | $3.07 M | |||
1957 MITO 1957Mitosis | $0.01279 | −7.22% | −14.80% | −15.38% | $2.32 M | $12.76 M | $1.77 M | |||
2126 OBT 2126Orbiter Finance | $0.000318 | 3.89% | −7.29% | −8.89% | $1.93 M | $2.97 M | $70,771.72 | |||
2263 CWEB 2263Coinweb | $0.0005852 | −2.72% | 10.84% | 13.55% | $1.46 M | $4.45 M | $89,853.46 | |||
2479 XPRT 2479Persistence | $0.003989 | 181.18% | 5.18% | 27.92% | $851,128.75 | $1.14 M | $10,680.67 | |||
3045 VLR 3045Velora | $0.0003566 | −1.02% | −1.10% | −20.86% | $595,774.10 | $713,200.00 | $204.87 | |||
3070 OWL 3070Owlto Finance | $0.0009483 | −7.49% | −39.85% | 61.58% | $577,265.77 | $1.90 M | $156,925.62 | |||
3434 XFI 3434CrossFi | $0.00551 | −22.13% | −14.06% | −12.76% | $387,185.00 | $485,120.72 | $19,379.87 | |||
3437 AI 3437Any Inu | $0.0₅92 | 0.16% | −6.36% | 0.78% | $386,718.66 | $386,721.59 | $2,311.97 | |||
3555 OMNI 3555OmniCat | $0.00000756 | −1.63% | −11.15% | −10.54% | $344,019.21 | $346,421.88 | $3.09 | |||
3596 BCUT 3596bitsCrunch | $0.0004023 | 1.92% | −13.98% | −13.93% | $327,311.52 | $402,300.00 | $3,415.78 | |||
4119 RBC 4119Rubic | $0.0012349 | −0.24% | −4.00% | −17.46% | $204,108.69 | $209,875.43 | $36,935.51 | |||
4846 WAM 4846Wam | $0.0002396 | 2.92% | 12.59% | −19.89% | $111,361.37 | $239,600.00 | $1,356.87 | |||
4931 FLY 4931Fly | $0.005487 | −0.69% | 6.04% | 6.75% | $105,024.15 | $540,731.96 | $2,368.88 | |||
6185 ANLOG 6185Analog | $0.00002193 | 1.72% | 6.04% | −71.28% | $40,725.97 | $198,641.30 | $10.93 | |||
6384 FRM 6384Ferrum Network | $0.0001227 | −96.47% | −99.72% | 1702.94% | $35,216.10 | $73,262.39 | $36.12 | |||
7337 WZRD 7337Wizardia | $0.00012378 | −8.37% | −16.99% | −5.70% | $17,346.45 | $37,140.00 | $1,509.55 | |||
10585 OMNI 10585Omni Network | $0.1499 | 0.56% | −4.76% | 54.75% | -- | $14.99 M | $85.65 | |||
10893 LENDS 10893Lends | $0.00003656 | 0.49% | −6.54% | 0.65% | -- | $22,850.00 | $4.04 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cross-Chain Communication in crypto?
Cross-chain communication is the infrastructure layer that lets otherwise-isolated blockchains exchange assets, data, and messages. Cross-chain communication solves blockchain fragmentation — liquidity, users, and state sit siloed on each chain. For investors, cross-chain protocols are picks-and-shovels infrastructure: adoption scales with the multichain economy, not any single chain. DropsTab tracks 50+ cross-chain communication projects, led by Chainlink (LINK), LayerZero (ZRO), and Wormhole (W). The category scanner filters these tokens side by side.
How does a crypto bridge differ from a messaging protocol?
A crypto bridge moves value between chains, typically via lock-and-mint or burn-and-mint mechanics. A messaging protocol passes arbitrary data and instructions, letting a contract on Chain A trigger logic on Chain B. Messaging is the broader primitive — bridging is one application built on top of messaging. LayerZero (ZRO) and Chainlink CCIP are messaging standards; Stargate (STG) and Across (ACX) are bridges. Messaging standards increasingly win token-issuer mint/burn integrations over legacy lock-and-mint bridges.
What are the main cross-chain security models?
Cross-chain protocols split into three security models. Light-client / ZK proof verification is trust-minimized, used by ZetaChain (ZETA) and Hyperlane (HYPER). Guardian/validator attestation relies on an external verifier set — Wormhole (W) uses a 13-of-19 Guardian multisig, Axelar (AXL) uses PoS validators. Optimistic verification uses a challenge window, used by Across (ACX). Security-model quality ranks as the sector's top differentiator, since a compromised validator set can drain locked collateral.
Which projects lead the cross-chain communication sector by market cap?
Chainlink (LINK) leads with CCIP, a messaging and token-transfer standard supporting 60+ chains and targeting institutional settlement. LayerZero (ZRO) reports $150B+ cumulative volume and 200M+ messages across 170+ chains as of June 2026. Wormhole (W) has transferred $50B+ across 35+ chains. Axelar (AXL), ZetaChain (ZETA), and Across (ACX) round out the leaders. DropsTab's category scanner ranks all cross-chain projects by market cap.
What are the top crypto bridges by design and volume?
Top crypto bridges span multiple designs. Across (ACX) is an optimistic, intents-based bridge focused on fast, capital-efficient transfers. Stargate (STG) provides unified-liquidity asset transfers. deBridge (DBR) uses intents-based routing. Wormhole (W) and Chainflip (FLIP) offer generic cross-chain transfers. Intents-based designs abstract routing away from users. Wormhole (W) has processed 1B+ messages and transferred $50B+ as of June 2026.
How is the cross-chain communication sector measured and ranked?
Analysts assess cross-chain protocols on structural indicators, not price. TVL (Total Value Locked) secured or bridged, number of connected chains, and cumulative message volume are the core metrics. Security-model design is the most critical axis — message finality latency and validator decentralization are recurring due-diligence points. Cross-chain data sits fragmented across explorers, so figures vary by source. DropsTab aggregates market cap, fundraising rounds, and vesting schedules for cross-chain projects, enabling side-by-side comparison.
What risks do cross-chain communication investors face?
Security is the sector's defining exposure. Bridges rank among crypto's most-exploited primitives. Over $2.8B in bridge losses have occurred since 2022, including Ronin (~$624M) and Wormhole (~$320M, since reimbursed). A compromised guardian or validator set can drain locked collateral. Concentration risk is high, since much cross-chain volume routes through a few protocols. Regulatory scrutiny may target asset-transfer rails under money-transmission and AML rules. Trust-minimized verification aims to reduce these exposures.
How can investors track cross-chain communication projects on DropsTab?
DropsTab's category scanner lists 50+ cross-chain communication tokens with filters for market cap, connected chains, and structural metrics. Vesting schedules and unlock calendars flag upcoming sell pressure for tokens like LayerZero (ZRO) and Wormhole (W). The fundraising database surfaces backer quality and raise history across the sector. Drops Bot alerts notify on unlock events and listing changes. These tools let investors compare cross-chain protocols without pulling data from fragmented explorers.