Cross-Сhain Communication
0.45%
−0.00%24h Change
7d Change
| 7d Chart | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16 LINK 16Chainlink | $8.34 | 0.29% | −0.40% | 7.59% | $6.25 B | $8.35 B | $66.80 M | |||
32 NEAR 32NEAR Protocol | $1.63 | 1.22% | −4.44% | −14.89% | $2.14 B | $2.14 B | $76.22 M | |||
70 JUP 70Jupiter | $0.1849 | −0.17% | −6.03% | −12.61% | $611.27 M | $1.26 B | $11.39 M | |||
92 PYTH 92Pyth Network | $0.04219 | 4.01% | 6.10% | −7.18% | $332.24 M | $421.90 M | $14.33 M | |||
94 ZRO 94LayerZero | $0.853 | 2.09% | 17.50% | −6.19% | $309.88 M | $852.70 M | $8.20 M | |||
200 SOON 200SOON | $0.2174 | −0.26% | −3.64% | 29.94% | $108.75 M | $217.50 M | $7.33 M | |||
214 ZAMA 214Zama | $0.04541 | −4.12% | −11.16% | 36.23% | $99.95 M | $499.73 M | $6.70 M | |||
298 BABYDOGE 298Baby Doge Coin | $0.0₈3508 | 4.14% | 13.39% | 19.02% | $62.72 M | $70.92 M | $1.52 M | |||
335 W 335Wormhole | $0.00855 | 1.27% | 4.64% | −11.73% | $54.01 M | $85.66 M | $2.31 M | |||
340 RIVER 340River | $2.66 | −6.39% | 7.36% | −29.24% | $52.41 M | $267.40 M | $1.92 M | |||
359 ELF 359aelf | $0.05815 | −0.46% | 1.04% | −4.70% | $48.22 M | $58.41 M | $802,413.00 | |||
367 ZETA 367ZetaChain | $0.03004 | 2.30% | 4.95% | −14.24% | $46.75 M | $63.00 M | $5.54 M | |||
374 AXL 374Axelar | $0.0376 | 2.21% | 3.28% | −8.99% | $45.79 M | $47.01 M | $1.49 M | |||
554 FLIP 554Chainflip | $0.3431 | −0.61% | 3.54% | 24.90% | $30.38 M | $30.66 M | $57,738.18 | |||
562 ACX 562Across Protocol | $0.04146 | 2.71% | 2.08% | −3.09% | $29.72 M | $41.46 M | $474,616.47 | |||
614 ICX 614ICON | $0.0236 | 1.49% | 9.57% | −5.16% | $25.71 M | $25.98 M | $491,682.00 | |||
615 DBR 615deBridge | $0.01425 | 0.80% | 2.72% | −11.94% | $25.63 M | $142.40 M | $1.25 M | |||
737 STG 737Stargate Finance | $0.136 | 6.12% | 13.82% | −18.55% | $19.22 M | $136.40 M | $12.09 M | |||
774 FLUX 774Flux | $0.0434 | 8.13% | 9.05% | −2.98% | $17.99 M | $17.99 M | $3.63 M | |||
852 CELR 852Celer Network | $0.00197 | 4.00% | 19.72% | 8.59% | $15.38 M | $19.70 M | $3.83 M | |||
917 LUMIA 917Lumia | $0.0769 | −0.45% | 1.27% | −36.55% | $13.36 M | $18.38 M | $796,569.44 | |||
993 HYPER 993Hyperlane | $0.0648 | 0.31% | −3.34% | −3.00% | $11.35 M | $64.80 M | $4.88 M | |||
1021 THOR 1021THORSwap | $0.04221 | −0.92% | 65.30% | 21.81% | $10.71 M | $11.87 M | $197.84 | |||
1027 WAN 1027Wanchain | $0.05307 | −0.89% | 3.92% | −0.07% | $10.59 M | $10.59 M | $992,948.00 | |||
1052 PORTAL 1052Portal | $0.01147 | −1.79% | 8.87% | −1.34% | $10.00 M | $11.44 M | $3.88 M | |||
1097 HFT 1097Hashflow | $0.01017 | −13.00% | 14.47% | 14.24% | $9.28 M | $10.13 M | $7.69 M | |||
1216 PTB 1216Portal to Bitcoin | $0.0008961 | 8.61% | 3.21% | 74.27% | $7.27 M | $7.52 M | $1.33 M | |||
1266 SUPRA 1266Supra | $0.0001988 | 4.61% | −2.94% | −12.23% | $6.50 M | $16.33 M | $166,579.43 | |||
1334 VULT 1334Vultisig | $0.08999 | −2.96% | −5.90% | −3.57% | $5.85 M | $9.00 M | $553.37 | |||
1368 ANY 1368Anyspend | $0.02472 | 0.00% | 1.02% | −0.89% | $5.44 M | $24.72 M | $0.21 | |||
1421 HDN 1421Hydranet | $0.02604 | −0.02% | −2.48% | −10.32% | $4.90 M | $7.81 M | $82,594.00 | |||
1488 MITO 1488Mitosis | $0.02387 | −2.28% | 8.17% | 3.84% | $4.33 M | $23.88 M | $1.27 M | |||
1649 FOX 1649ShapeShift FOX | $0.004235 | 1.08% | −0.24% | 2.13% | $3.27 M | $4.23 M | $4,453.34 | |||
1867 ZEUS 1867Zeus Network | $0.002462 | −2.49% | 2.57% | −12.19% | $2.28 M | $2.45 M | $1.37 M | |||
2054 CWEB 2054Coinweb | $0.0007138 | −1.20% | −1.84% | −21.11% | $1.76 M | $5.42 M | $58,071.91 | |||
2125 OBT 2125Orbiter Finance | $0.0002965 | 5.23% | 2.40% | −15.58% | $1.62 M | $2.95 M | $82,768.59 | |||
2340 XFI 2340CrossFi | $0.01793 | 15.52% | 32.24% | −30.84% | $1.22 M | $1.53 M | $23,971.83 | |||
2841 BCUT 2841bitsCrunch | $0.0006826 | −10.20% | 19.12% | −23.87% | $682,600.00 | $682,600.00 | $52,365.36 | |||
2968 RBC 2968Rubic | $0.003568 | 0.26% | 3.26% | 6.46% | $591,384.66 | $605,104.20 | $87,969.12 | |||
3170 XPRT 3170Persistence | $0.002215 | 6.04% | 29.36% | −11.73% | $473,038.96 | $473,045.08 | $7,272.65 | |||
3224 VLR 3224Velora | $0.0002676 | −5.08% | −1.43% | −18.97% | $447,063.89 | $535,200.00 | $0.44 | |||
3542 AI 3542Any Inu | $0.0₅77 | −0.94% | 2.15% | 10.18% | $323,666.70 | $323,669.16 | $1,796.02 | |||
3747 OWL 3747Owlto Finance | $0.0007946 | −8.66% | −3.67% | −10.60% | $262,449.00 | $1.59 M | $120,570.26 | |||
3923 OMNI 3923OmniCat | $0.00000494 | 2.71% | 4.65% | 9.49% | $224,795.62 | $226,365.62 | $5.02 | |||
4253 WAM 4253Wam | $0.0003622 | 0.39% | −2.08% | 10.90% | $168,343.44 | $362,200.00 | $3,278.93 | |||
4618 NTRN 4618Neutron | $0.0002001 | −0.36% | −41.01% | −75.78% | $121,245.70 | $129,691.48 | $471.85 | |||
4852 FLY 4852Fly | $0.005941 | −8.13% | −10.92% | −24.20% | $100,456.16 | $585,601.56 | $653.70 | |||
5493 ROUTE 5493Router Protocol | $0.00009044 | 0.07% | −18.39% | −57.15% | $61,344.44 | $88,759.69 | $13,062.57 | |||
6743 ANLOG 6743Analog | $0.00001198 | −35.21% | −37.70% | −66.62% | $22,247.93 | $108,514.49 | $92.53 | |||
7424 WZRD 7424Wizardia | $0.00008763 | 10.64% | −56.58% | −95.66% | $12,280.41 | $26,289.00 | $829.31 | |||
8858 FRM 8858Ferrum Network | $0.00000567 | −95.27% | 9.30% | −95.28% | $1,627.34 | $3,385.47 | $1.43 | |||
9675 OMNI 9675Omni Network | $0.15 | 0.00% | −55.10% | −77.17% | -- | $15.00 M | $10.50 | |||
9862 LENDS 9862Lends | $0.00003099 | 0.01% | 2.10% | 10.36% | -- | $19,368.75 | $2.89 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cross-Chain Communication in crypto?
Cross-chain communication is the infrastructure layer that lets otherwise-isolated blockchains exchange assets, data, and messages. Cross-chain communication solves blockchain fragmentation — liquidity, users, and state sit siloed on each chain. For investors, cross-chain protocols are picks-and-shovels infrastructure: adoption scales with the multichain economy, not any single chain. DropsTab tracks 50+ cross-chain communication projects, led by Chainlink (LINK), LayerZero (ZRO), and Wormhole (W). The category scanner filters these tokens side by side.
How does a crypto bridge differ from a messaging protocol?
A crypto bridge moves value between chains, typically via lock-and-mint or burn-and-mint mechanics. A messaging protocol passes arbitrary data and instructions, letting a contract on Chain A trigger logic on Chain B. Messaging is the broader primitive — bridging is one application built on top of messaging. LayerZero (ZRO) and Chainlink CCIP are messaging standards; Stargate (STG) and Across (ACX) are bridges. Messaging standards increasingly win token-issuer mint/burn integrations over legacy lock-and-mint bridges.
What are the main cross-chain security models?
Cross-chain protocols split into three security models. Light-client / ZK proof verification is trust-minimized, used by ZetaChain (ZETA) and Hyperlane (HYPER). Guardian/validator attestation relies on an external verifier set — Wormhole (W) uses a 13-of-19 Guardian multisig, Axelar (AXL) uses PoS validators. Optimistic verification uses a challenge window, used by Across (ACX). Security-model quality ranks as the sector's top differentiator, since a compromised validator set can drain locked collateral.
Which projects lead the cross-chain communication sector by market cap?
Chainlink (LINK) leads with CCIP, a messaging and token-transfer standard supporting 60+ chains and targeting institutional settlement. LayerZero (ZRO) reports $150B+ cumulative volume and 200M+ messages across 170+ chains as of June 2026. Wormhole (W) has transferred $50B+ across 35+ chains. Axelar (AXL), ZetaChain (ZETA), and Across (ACX) round out the leaders. DropsTab's category scanner ranks all cross-chain projects by market cap.
What are the top crypto bridges by design and volume?
Top crypto bridges span multiple designs. Across (ACX) is an optimistic, intents-based bridge focused on fast, capital-efficient transfers. Stargate (STG) provides unified-liquidity asset transfers. deBridge (DBR) uses intents-based routing. Wormhole (W) and Chainflip (FLIP) offer generic cross-chain transfers. Intents-based designs abstract routing away from users. Wormhole (W) has processed 1B+ messages and transferred $50B+ as of June 2026.
How is the cross-chain communication sector measured and ranked?
Analysts assess cross-chain protocols on structural indicators, not price. TVL (Total Value Locked) secured or bridged, number of connected chains, and cumulative message volume are the core metrics. Security-model design is the most critical axis — message finality latency and validator decentralization are recurring due-diligence points. Cross-chain data sits fragmented across explorers, so figures vary by source. DropsTab aggregates market cap, fundraising rounds, and vesting schedules for cross-chain projects, enabling side-by-side comparison.
What risks do cross-chain communication investors face?
Security is the sector's defining exposure. Bridges rank among crypto's most-exploited primitives. Over $2.8B in bridge losses have occurred since 2022, including Ronin (~$624M) and Wormhole (~$320M, since reimbursed). A compromised guardian or validator set can drain locked collateral. Concentration risk is high, since much cross-chain volume routes through a few protocols. Regulatory scrutiny may target asset-transfer rails under money-transmission and AML rules. Trust-minimized verification aims to reduce these exposures.
How can investors track cross-chain communication projects on DropsTab?
DropsTab's category scanner lists 50+ cross-chain communication tokens with filters for market cap, connected chains, and structural metrics. Vesting schedules and unlock calendars flag upcoming sell pressure for tokens like LayerZero (ZRO) and Wormhole (W). The fundraising database surfaces backer quality and raise history across the sector. Drops Bot alerts notify on unlock events and listing changes. These tools let investors compare cross-chain protocols without pulling data from fragmented explorers.